The benefits of C++ competitive programming for both hiring managers and developers

Participating in coding competitions, also known as competitive programming, involves tackling intricate coding challenges. Success in these events can often pave the way for a thriving career in software development. Conversely, recruiters seeking exceptional talent often turn their attention to competitive algorithm contests. In fact, my own journey to Google began eight years ago when they recognized my strong C++ competitive programming ranking on the Topcoder Single Round Match (SRM) platform, leading to my recruitment as an engineer.

Emerging from college campuses in the 1970s, competitive programming has since gained immense traction, captivating the interest of major technology companies, and encompassing areas like algorithm programming, machine learning, and game development. This article presents my personal insights and journey as a ranked algorithm programmer.

Exploring Competitive Algorithm Events

The majority of algorithm competitions unfold on dedicated online platforms, attracting tens of thousands of participants globally for each contest. Several online platforms facilitate regular, live, and ranked contests, including:

Prominent contest sponsors encompass multinational corporations (e.g., Meta, Google—although this ended with the project’s closure in July 2023) and student-focused organizations (e.g., ICPC, IOI). Furthermore, entities like UVa Online Judge and Project Euler contribute to the competitive programming community by offering coding challenges for developers.

Contest Format

Typically, algorithm contests present competitors with three to six problems to solve within a specified timeframe. Participants strive to solve these problems by writing programs in their preferred programming language. Some platforms, like Codeforces, allow programmers to devise test cases designed to expose flaws in their peers’ code, earning points for successful “hacks.”

Scoring System

Points are primarily awarded for submitting accurate solutions to the challenges. Contest platforms maintain strict evaluation criteria, automatically assessing each solution against a comprehensive suite of pre-defined test cases. Points are awarded based on development speed, algorithm efficiency, and code correctness.

While most platforms only grant points for flawless solutions, some award partial credit for partially correct answers, such as those that overlook specific edge cases or exhibit slow performance with large datasets, as long as they still provide a solution.

Rating Calculation

After points are assigned, an Elo-inspired formula is employed to calculate participant ratings. This formula aims to precisely represent competitors’ skills in relation to their peers. Therefore, as a developer participates in more competitions, their rating becomes a more reliable indicator of their true skill level.

Competitive Algorithm Programmers: Prime Engineering Candidates

A competitive programming rating serves as a strong indicator of a developer’s capabilities. Despite variations in rating systems across online platforms, percentile rankings offer a consistent basis for comparison. These ratings are publicly accessible, making them readily available to interested parties.

Fortune 100 technology companies have long recognized the value of competitive algorithm programming. Global corporations frequently sponsor these competitions as a dual-purpose strategy for marketing and talent acquisition.

Streamlined Recruitment

Targeting highly ranked competitors allows companies to optimize their hiring process by omitting interview stages that typically filter out unqualified candidates. A condensed hiring pipeline benefits both developers and organizations:

  • Reduced Costs for Organizations: Fewer interview rounds translate into fewer meetings and travel expenses per candidate.
  • Enhanced Hiring Competitiveness: Expedited hiring decisions minimize the time between a candidate’s initial interview and a job offer. For companies, this translates to improved candidate retention. For developers, it results in a smoother, less drawn-out interview experience.

Transferable Professional Abilities

A candidate with a high rating from a reputable contest platform demonstrably possesses proficiency in algorithms and data structures. Essentially, competition problems mirror real-world coding interview questions. Expertise gained from competitive programming equips individuals with verifiable, practical skills:

Competitive Expertise

Corresponding Professional Skills

Solving puzzles quickly and accurately

  • Code accuracy
  • Development speed

Identifying and covering all possible test cases

Debugging algorithms

  • Debugging business logic

Developing efficient algorithms

  • Scalable algorithm development
  • Code design

Adversarial thinking

  • Security
  • Careful adherence to requirements and specifications

Step-by-step reasoning

  • Business analysis
  • Use case generation
  • Requirement clarification and negotiation

Moreover, it’s crucial to acknowledge technical creativity as the driving force behind innovation. Tackling challenging algorithm contest problems demands ingenuity and resourcefulness. It logically follows that highly ranked competitors are likely to excel in technical creativity—a highly sought-after attribute in professional engineers.

For programmers, showcasing your rating in the Honors and Awards section of your résumé can significantly enhance your visibility. Hiring managers, on the other hand, can benefit from identifying these candidates to simplify their recruitment efforts.

Skills Not Evaluated in Competitive Algorithm Events

It’s important to recognize that algorithm contests concentrate on a particular skill set, potentially overlooking certain essential proficiencies:

Parallel computing

A contest program is usually tested on a server that is restricted to a single thread. As a result, a competitive programmer may be less experienced with multithreading techniques.

Networking

A contest puzzle is designed to be solved within a single program, with all the required input and output handled locally. In contrast, a networked setting introduces complexities that fall outside of the scope of algorithm contests.

Readability

In competitive programming, readability takes a back seat to development speed. In the workplace, engineers must adapt to company standards and write intelligible, clearly documented code.

Leadership and teamwork

Developers compete individually in rated algorithm contests. However, professional software is usually developed by teams, and communication and soft skills are crucial to achieving success.

Software architecture and strategic planning

A program designed to solve a contest puzzle is typically short and written quickly. In contrast, professional software is developed with long-term adaptability in mind.

System operations

A contest puzzle is typically solved by a small program that is executed once, contrary to the real world, where programs require maintenance and must interoperate with a kaleidoscope of systems.

Adaptability to changing priorities

Contest puzzles are clearly defined with explicit requirements and objectives. Consequently, a competitive algorithm programmer may have less experience with open-ended situations.

The question arises: Can a competitive programmer successfully transition into the professional engineering world? The answer is a resounding yes, as numerous individuals have done so successfully. It’s advisable for those new to the field to complement their skill set with additional technical and soft skills. Hiring managers can then focus on assessing business acumen or other relevant skills, leveraging the competitive programmer’s proven algorithmic strengths.

C++: An Ideal Choice for Competitive Algorithm Events

As a high-performance language, C++ enjoys widespread popularity in the realm of competitive programming. C++ offers a comprehensive standard library and convenient access to bit manipulation and low-level data types—features often valuable in contest problems.

Although designed for large-scale enterprise systems, competitors in algorithm contests tend to utilize a specific subset of C++’s extensive capabilities:

Frequency in Competitive Programming

C++ Language Feature

Ubiquitous

  • Standard library containers and algorithms
  • Lambdas
  • Low-level access to elemental types
  • Bit manipulation

Occasional

  • Template generics
  • Preprocessor macros
  • GDB and other step debuggers
  • Operator overloading

Negligible

  • Threads
  • Polymorphism
  • Exceptions
  • Smart pointers

It’s essential to note that aspiring developers should strive to master C++ features beyond the competitive algorithm programming subset outlined here to prepare for the professional world.

Guidance for Aspiring Competitive Algorithm Programmers

Embarking on your competitive programming journey is as simple as creating an account on your chosen platform and registering for a live contest. However, excelling in this field requires preparation, continuous learning, and unwavering dedication.

A highly effective practice method involves tackling problems from previous contests. This familiarizes you with your chosen platform’s standard contest format. Mastering fundamental algorithms and techniques (e.g., the shortest path problem and the caterpillar method) fosters confidence and equips you for competition.

Make use of the post-contest editorials available on many contest platforms. These resources provide comprehensive explanations of past problems, including detailed analyses of the solutions. Some platforms even host a dedicated curated list of practice puzzles.

Transitioning from Competitive Programming to the Professional Sphere

My entry into the professional world was marked by several years of competitive programming experience and an undergraduate degree. Over time, I embraced diverse assignments, collaborated with numerous teams, and evolved into a proficient site reliability engineer.

Early in my site reliability engineering role at Google, I had a pivotal realization. My exceptional performance on a project that capitalized on my competitive C++ programming skills highlighted my aptitude in situations demanding this specific skill set. Subsequently, my manager and I decided to focus on projects emphasizing these strengths. As a result, I experienced both personal and professional fulfillment, achieving success and finding my niche within the industry.

With the growing prevalence of competitive programming, hiring managers will increasingly encounter candidates with algorithm contest experience. Grasping the skill set associated with this background is crucial to unlocking a competitive programmer’s full potential. And for those who are competitive programmers—whether specializing in C++ or another language—showcasing your achievements can significantly enhance your professional profile.

The editorial team of the Toptal Engineering Blog expresses gratitude to Umer Arshad for reviewing the technical content presented in this article.

Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0